Search Results for "JVET-P0003"

Found 2 document(s)

Search documents

Use number, keyword, author, or MPEG number. Filter by meeting when needed.

16th Meeting: Geneva, October 2019 2019-10-03 09:08
Abstract
This report summarises the activities of the AhG3 on Test model software development that has taken place between the 15th and 16th JVET meetings.
JVET-P0003 JVET AHG report: Test model software development (AHG3) [F. Bossen, X. Li, K. Sühring]

This AHG report was discussed Thursday 3 October 0945 (GJS & JRO).

This report summarizes the activities of the AhG3 on Test model software development that has taken place between the 15th and 16th JVET meetings.

VTM software development

Development was continued on the GitLab server, which allows participants to register accounts and use a distributed development workflow based on git.

The server is located at:

https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de

The registration and development workflow is documented at:

https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvet/VVCSoftware_VTM/wikis/VVC-Software-Development-Workflow

The VTM software can be found at

https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvet/VVCSoftware_VTM/

CTC Performance

The following table shows VTM 6.1 performance over HM 16.20:

All Intra

Over HM-16.20

Y

U

V

EncT

DecT

Class A1

-28.12%

-33.44%

-33.64%

1627%

174%

Class A2

-27.86%

-20.72%

-13.06%

2625%

183%

Class B

-21.10%

-19.86%

-27.27%

2927%

190%

Class C

-21.81%

-19.77%

-23.98%

4098%

204%

Class E

-25.16%

-21.29%

-25.60%

2393%

176%

Overall

-24.23%

-22.48%

-24.96%

2716%

187%

Class D

-17.70%

-14.41%

-15.71%

4741%

198%

Class F

-38.92%

-39.43%

-41.80%

4338%

186%

Random Access

Over HM-16.20

Y

U

V

EncT

DecT

Class A1

-37.32%

-38.56%

-44.50%

843%

162%

Class A2

-41.64%

-38.65%

-32.64%

932%

174%

Class B

-33.98%

-41.65%

-43.13%

902%

160%

Class C

-28.65%

-32.77%

-34.87%

1144%

174%

Class E

Overall

-34.76%

-38.06%

-39.10%

954%

167%

Class D

-26.40%

-29.45%

-30.18%

1231%

178%

Class F

-40.66%

-45.33%

-46.77%

640%

142%

Low Delay B

Over HM-16.20

Y

U

V

EncT

DecT

Class A1

Class A2

Class B

-26.95%

-30.69%

-31.68%

861%

150%

Class C

-22.91%

-23....

References:
JVET-N0100 JVET-N0278 JVET-N0288 JVET-N0353 JVET-N0494 JVET-N0865 JVET-N0867 JVET-O0041 JVET-O0042 JVET-O0044 JVET-O0046 JVET-O0047 JVET-O0050 JVET-O0052 JVET-O0055 JVET-O0057 JVET-O0060 JVET-O0061 JVET-O0065 JVET-O0070 JVET-O0078 JVET-O0090 JVET-O0094 JVET-O0105 JVET-O0106 JVET-O0108 JVET-O0119 JVET-O0122 JVET-O0126 JVET-O0143 JVET-O0145 JVET-O0147 JVET-O0148 JVET-O0152 JVET-O0159 JVET-O0162 JVET-O0163 JVET-O0164 JVET-O0165 JVET-O0173 JVET-O0176 JVET-O0177 JVET-O0178 JVET-O0179 JVET-O0181 JVET-O0189 JVET-O0193 JVET-O0199 JVET-O0211 JVET-O0213 JVET-O0215 JVET-O0216 JVET-O0219 JVET-O0220 JVET-O0226 JVET-O0235 JVET-O0236 JVET-O0238 JVET-O0241 JVET-O0244 JVET-O0245 JVET-O0247 JVET-O0249 JVET-O0256 JVET-O0258 JVET-O0263 JVET-O0265 JVET-O0267 JVET-O0272 JVET-O0277 JVET-O0280 JVET-O0282 JVET-O0284 JVET-O0288 JVET-O0294 JVET-O0297 JVET-O0299 JVET-O0304 JVET-O0315 JVET-O0357 JVET-O0364 JVET-O0366 JVET-O0368 JVET-O0376 JVET-O0379 JVET-O0409 JVET-O0414 JVET-O0425 JVET-O0426 JVET-O0428 JVET-O0429 JVET-O0432 JVET-O0438 JVET-O0452 JVET-O0455 JVET-O0472 JVET-O0491 JVET-O0500 JVET-O0525 JVET-O0526 JVET-O0529 JVET-O0538 JVET-O0540 JVET-O0541 JVET-O0543 JVET-O0545 JVET-O0567 JVET-O0570 JVET-O0587 JVET-O0588 JVET-O0590 JVET-O0592 JVET-O0594 JVET-O0596 JVET-O0610 JVET-O0616 JVET-O0617 JVET-O0619 JVET-O0625 JVET-O0634 JVET-O0637 JVET-O0640 JVET-O0650 JVET-O0655 JVET-O0681 JVET-O0756 JVET-O0919 JVET-O0925 JVET-O1124 JVET-O1136 JVET-O1140 JVET-O1143 JVET-O1153 JVET-O1159 JVET-O1164 JVET-O1168 JVET-O1170
Decisions
It was commented that integration of HLS aspects in software has sometimes been difficult. One issue has been the need for clarity on who is responsible for software for some of these aspects. Making sure we have a clear identification of one person responsible was a suggestion for how to improve this.
Citation
16th Meeting: Geneva, October 2019 2019-11-05 21:43
Authors: C.-Y. Chen Andrew Segall Jens-Rainer Ohm
Abstract
The goal of this Core Experiment (CE) is to improve and/or enhance cross component loop filtering (CC-ALF) techniques. These CC-ALF techniques will be evaluated according to both subjective and objective metrics.
JVET-P2025 Description of Core Experiment 5 (CE5): Cross-component adaptive loop filtering [C.-Y. Chen, A. Segall]

See track A notes under JVET-P1033 about what to test.

Future meeting plans, expressions of thanks, and closing of the meeting

Future meeting plans were established according to the following guidelines:

  • Meeting under ITU-T SG 16 auspices when it meets (ordinarily starting meetings on the Tuesday of the first week and closing it on the Wednesday of the second week of the SG 16 meeting – a total of 9 meeting days), and
  • Otherwise meeting under ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 auspices when it meets (ordinarily starting meetings on the Tuesday prior to such meetings and closing it at lunchtime on the last day of the WG 11 meeting – a total of 9.5 meeting days).

In cases where an exceptionally high workload is expected for a meeting, an earlier starting date may be defined. For the upcoming meeting in October 2019, the SG16 parent-level meeting dates had been shifted after the JVET and MPEG meeting plans were established, which has caused an additional adjustment in the JVET dates.

Some specific future meeting plans (to be confirmed) were established as follows:

  • Tue. 7 – Fri. 17 January 2020, 17th meeting under WG 11 auspices in Brussels, BE.
  • Wed. 15 – Fri. 24 April 2020, 18th meeting under WG 11 auspices in Alpbach, AT.
  • Tue. 23 June – Wed. 1 July 2020, 19th meeting under ITU-T auspices in Geneva, CH.
  • Wed. 7 – Fri. 16 October 2020, 20th meeting under WG 11 auspices in Rennes, FR.

The agreed document deadline for the 17thJVET meeting was planned to be Tuesday 31 December...

Decisions
Tianyang Zhou (Sharp Corporation)
Citation
New Search