Search Results for "JVET-D0047"

Found 2 document(s)

Search documents

Use number, keyword, author, or MPEG number. Filter by meeting when needed.

4th Meeting: Chengdu, October 2016 2016-10-25 09:00

Abstract not available in document

JVET-D0047 Extended deblocking-filter decision for large block boundary [K. Kawamura, S. Naito (KDDI)]

This contribution proposes an extension of both the deblocking filter decision and deblocking filter process for large block boundaries, which is a revised version from the JVET-C0049 proposal. In HEVC, both large transform blocks and large prediction blocks were introduced. When a large block is used for a smooth area where luma value is little varying and/or gradation, the blocking artefact becomes much visible on low bitrate. For improving the visual quality, this contribution proposes an extension of edge filtering decision and process only for a boundary of large blocks. Compared with the previous proposal, the proposed method is harmonized with the QTBT structure in JEM3.0 while it includes additional decision criteria.

Number of filtered samples for large blocks (>=16) is increased from 6 to 14.

The method has BD rate loss of 0.2% on average.

It was unclear if it gives a subjective benefit, but at the current meeting there was no possibility for viewing for this topic.

No interest was expressed by other experts.

Decisions
No interest was expressed by other experts.
Citation
4th Meeting: Chengdu, October 2016 2016-12-20 19:34
Abstract
This document defines common test conditions and software reference configurations to be used in video codec performance evaluation for 360° video. These 360° video test conditions are also recommended for use in technical contributions to the 5th JVET meetings.
JVET-D1030 JVET common test conditions and evaluation procedures for 360 video [E. Alshina, J. Boyce, A. Abbas, Y. Ye] [2016-11-11] (MPEG N16515)

A draft of this document was presented to the plenary Thursday afternoon. During the closing plenary on Friday, the document was approved without further review; no experts had complaints about the procedure.

It was reminded that in cases where a JVET document is also made available as an MPEG output document, a separate version under the MPEG document header should also be generated. This version should be sent to GJS and JRO for review and upload.

Title and Email Reflector

Chairs

Mtg

Tool evaluation (AHG1)

(jvet@lists.rwth-aachen.de)

  • Coordinate the exploration experiments.
  • Investigate interaction of tools in JEM and exploration experiment branches.
  • Discuss and evaluate methodologies and criteria to assess the benefit of tools, and how to ease the assessment of single tools in terms of encoder runtime.
  • Study and summarize new technology proposals.

E. Alshina, M. Karczewicz (co‑chairs)

N

JEM algorithm description editing (AHG2)

(jvet@lists.rwth-aachen.de)

  • Produce and finalize JVET-D1001 Algorithm Description of Joint Exploration Test Model 4
  • Gather and address comments for refinement of the document
  • Coordinate with the JEM software development AHG to address issues relating to mismatches between software and text.

J. Chen (chair) E. Alshina, J. Boyce (vice chairs)

N

JEM software development (AHG3)

(jvet@lists.rwth-aachen.de)

  • Coordinate development of the JEM4.0 software packages and their distribution.
  • Produce documentation of software usage for...
Decisions
Wen Zuo (ZTE)
Citation
New Search