Back to Search Document details
18th Meeting: Teleconference, April 2020 2020-04-03 21:38
AHG9: On miscellaneous updates for HLS signalling
Abstract
This contribution proposed the following changes to the HLS related signalling as follows:
JVET-R0191 AHG9: On miscellaneous updates for HLS signalling [Hendry, S. Paluri, S. Kim (LGE)]

Item 5 of this contribution belongs to this category.

This proposes to specify a general constraint flag on LMCS i.e., no_lmcs_constraint_flag.

This is also proposed in JVET-R0286 aspect 2. See the notes for that contribution.

JVET-R0191 AHG9: On miscellaneous updates for HLS signalling [Hendry, S. Paluri, S. Kim (LGE)]

Item 4 of this contribution belongs to this category.

It is proposed to constrain that when sps_virtual_boundaries_enabled_flag is equal to 1 and sps_virtual_boundaries_present_flag is equal to 0, there shall be at least one picture header in the CLVS with ph_virtual_boundaries_present_flag equal to 1.

It was remarked that this constraint seems unnecessary and might interfere with potential extraction or splicing cases or encoder choices or low-delay operation cases, so no action was taken on this.

JVET-R0191 AHG9: On miscellaneous updates for HLS signalling [Hendry, S. Paluri, S. Kim (LGE)]

Item 4 of this contribution belongs to this category.

It is proposed to constrain that when sps_virtual_boundaries_enabled_flag is equal to 1 and sps_virtual_boundaries_present_flag is equal to 0, there shall be at least one picture header in the CLVS with ph_virtual_boundaries_present_flag equal to 1.

It was remarked that this constraint seems unnecessary and might interfere with potential extraction or splicing cases or encoder choices or low-delay operation cases, so no action was taken on this.

JVET-R0191 AHG9: On miscellaneous updates for HLS signalling [Hendry, S. Paluri, S. Kim (LGE)]

Items 2, 3 of this contribution belong to this category.

PATENTS:
EP3518176B1 0.34 2024-08-07 CA2997355C 0.32 2025-05-06 US11210815B2 0.30 2021-12-28 US12250415B2 0.28 2025-03-11 US9679332B2 0.26 2017-06-13 US10387857B2 0.24 2019-08-20 JP6961845B2 0.22 2021-11-05 US9583140B1 0.20 2017-02-28
Decisions
This is also proposed in JVET-R0286 aspect 2. See the notes for that contribution.
Item 1 of this contribution belongs to this category.
It was remarked that this constraint seems unnecessary and might interfere with potential extraction or splicing cases or encoder choices or low-delay operation cases, so no action was taken on this.
Items 2, 3 of this contribution belong to this category.
Citation