Back to Search Document details
41st Meeting: by teleconference, CH, January 2026 2026-01-16 18:15
AHG17/AHG18: On ULL evaluation metrics toward CfP
Abstract
This contribution reviews the framework for low-latency techniques in previous international video coding standards and discusses evaluation metrics about video coding delay. The purpose of this contribution is to help discussions regarding the testing conditions on ultra-low latency (ULL) in the call for proposals (CfP) on video compression with capability beyond VVC.
JVET-AO0072 AHG17/AHG18: On ULL evaluation metrics toward CfP [T. Chujoh, Y. Kidani, K. Kawamura (KDDI)]

This contribution reviews the framework for low-latency techniques in previous international video coding standards and discusses evaluation metrics about video coding delay. The purpose of this contribution is to help discussions regarding the testing conditions on ultra-low latency (ULL) in the call for proposals (CfP) on video compression with capability beyond VVC.

It was agreed that requesting such information in CfP submissions would be useful. It was however pointed out that HRD concepts might not apply to some algorithms, or might be wrongly interpreted.

When coded bits per picture are known, many other of the metrics can be determined.

It was asked how different proposals would be compared in terms of the reported metrics? The initial seems to unveil at least the worst case of delay, and if it is exceedingly high.

It was commented that, in the current view of AHG18, processing time for encoding and decoding is not considered.

AHG19: Hardware implementation complexity (4)

Contributions in this area were discussed during 1650–1730 UTC on Friday 16 Jan. 2026 (chaired by JRO).

JVET-AO0147, JVET-AO0247, JVET-AO0249, and JVET-AO0286 are related on aspects of AI hardware complexity.

Decisions
It was commented that, in the current view of AHG18, processing time for encoding and decoding is not considered.
Citation