Search Results for "JVET-AE0123"

Found 5 document(s)

Search documents

Use number, keyword, author, or MPEG number. Filter by meeting when needed.

31st Meeting: Geneva, CH, July 2023 2023-07-06 14:40
Abstract
This contribution reports further results for the RDO Optimization method in ALF, which was proposed in JVET-AD0136. Regarding the proposed method, the chroma Lagrange multiplier will be adjusted by a scaling factor when the luma ALF APS transmission flag is ON and the number of history chroma ALF APS is insufficient. With VTM20.0 as anchor and test platform, the reported overall PSNR-Y,U,V BD-rate and {EncT, DecT} variations of this proposal are as follows:
JVET-AE0123 AHG10: Lagrange multiplier optimization for chroma ALF and CCALF [S.-W. Xie, Y. Gao, M.-H. Jia, Y.-L. Hu, C. Huang, P. Wu (ZTE)]

This contribution reports further results for the RDO method in ALF, which was proposed in JVET-AD0136. Regarding the proposed method, the chroma Lagrange multiplier will be adjusted by a scaling factor when the luma ALF APS transmission flag is ON and the number of history chroma ALF APS is insufficient. With VTM20.0 as anchor and test platform, the reported overall PSNR-Y,U,V BD-rate and {EncT, DecT} variations of this proposal are as follows:

  • LDB: 0.05%, -0.80%, -1.18% {100%, 100%}
  • LDP: 0.02%, -0.89%, -1.03% {100%, 101%}

As a general policy, encoder optimizations of this kind should equally be applied to the VTM and ECM. In the last meeting, it had specifically been requested to improve the performance of the ECM (where apparently losses had been observed, according to the JVET-AD1000 meeting notes. It was verbally reported that the ECM performance would be similar with the new proposal, but no results were provided.

For VTM, the results look beneficial, chroma gains outweigh the small luma losses.

It was pointed out that for ECM it might be necessary to adjust the multiplier differently.

Further study was encouraged on implementing the method on top of the ECM.

Decisions
Further study was encouraged on implementing the method on top of the ECM.
Citation
31st Meeting: Geneva, CH, July 2023 2023-07-15 00:17
Authors: Honglei Zhang Tencent Han Zhang
Abstract
This contribution reports the crosscheck results of JVET-AE0123: AhG10: Lagrange multiplier optimization for chroma ALF and CCALF. It is reported that the results match what was provided by the proponent.
JVET-AE0262 Crosscheck of JVET-AE0123 (AHG10: Lagrange multiplier optimization for chroma ALF and CCALF) [H. Zhang (Tencent)] [late]

AHG13: Film grain synthesis (2)

Contributions in this area were discussed in the BoG reported in JVET-AE0294, and at 1445 on Saturday 15 July 2023 (chaired by JRO).

References:
Decisions
JVET-AE0262 Crosscheck of JVET-AE0123 (AHG10: Lagrange multiplier optimization for chroma ALF and CCALF) [H. Zhang (Tencent)] [late]
Citation
32nd Meeting: Hannover, DE, October 2023 2023-10-14 10:06
Abstract
This contribution reports further results for the RDO Optimization method in ALF, which was proposed in JVET-AD0136[1] and JVET-AE0123[2]. Regarding the proposed method, the chroma Lagrange multiplier will be adjusted by a scaling factor when the luma ALF APS transmission flag is ON and the number of history chroma ALF APS is insufficient. With VTM-22.0 and ECM-10.0 as anchors and test platforms, the reported overall PSNR-Y, U, V BD-rate and {EncT, DecT} variations of this proposal are as follows:
JVET-AF0122 AhG10: Lagrange multiplier optimization for chroma ALF and CCALF [S.-W. Xie, Y. Gao, M.-H. Jia, Y.-X. Bai, C. Huang, P. Wu (ZTE)]

This contribution reports further results for the RDO Optimization method in ALF, which was proposed in JVET-AD0136 and JVET-AE0123. Regarding the proposed method, the chroma Lagrange multiplier will be adjusted by a scaling factor when the luma ALF APS transmission flag is ON and the number of history chroma ALF APS is insufficient. With VTM-22.0 and ECM-10.0 as anchors and test platforms, the reported overall PSNR-Y, U, V BD-rate and {EncT, DecT} variations of this proposal are as follows:

On top of VTM-22.0:

  • LDB: 0.05%, -0.80%, -1.18% {100%, 100%}
  • LDP: 0.02%, -0.89%, -1.03% {100%, 101%}

On top of ECM-10.0:

  • LDB: 0.04%, -1.89%, -1.60% {100.0%, 100.7%}
  • LDP: 0.11%, -1.60%, -1.45% {100.2%, 100.3%}

During the discussion of JVET-AE0123, it was suggested that the multiplier might need to be adjusted for ECM compared to VTM. The proponent reported that experimentations had been conducted to adjust the multiplier, and results show that using the same value for VTM and ECM achieves the most balanced performance among luma and chroma components.

Cross checker reported that VTM results have been completed, but ECM results are still partial at the time of presesntation. VTM results and partial ECM results are matched with that provided by the proponent.

It was asked why this has no effect on RA config. This could be because for RA config parallel encoding is performed.

Whereas the performance for VTM is considered to be overall beneficial...

Decisions
adopted
Decision (SW): Adopt JVET-AF0122 to the next release of VTM, turned off by default.
Citation
32nd Meeting: Hannover, DE, October 2023 2023-10-13 10:00
Abstract
This document summarizes the activities of AHG10 on encoding algorithm optimization, between the 31th meeting (Antalya, Geneva, CH, 11–19 July 2023) and the 32nd meeting (Hannover, DE, 13–20 October 2023).
JVET-AF0010 JVET AHG report: Encoding algorithm optimization (AHG10) [P. de Lagrange, A. Duenas, R. Sjöberg, A. Tourapis (AHG chairs)] Related contributions A total of 5 contributions, not including cross-checks, are identified relating to AHG10, and summarized in the following sections. DMVR encoder control JVET-AF0057 – EE2-3.5: DMVR with robust MV derivation Though this contribution in an EE2 test, it contains an encoder-only aspect (test 3.5b), maxing out the RD cost of coding modes where DMVR is likely to create annoying artefacts. The BD-rate impact can be up to around 2% for high QPs (the normative solution seems to have both much less BD-rate impact and better subjective quality). Adaptive resolution JVET-AF0058 – AHG12: GOP-based RPR encoder control for ECM This contribution proposes to port the GOP-base RPR encoder control feature available in the VTM to ECM. The gains seem to...
Decisions
The AHG recommended that the related input contributions be reviewed and to further continue the study of encoding algorithm optimizations in JVET.
Citation
31st Meeting: Geneva, CH, July 2023 2023-09-15 12:55
Abstract
This document contains the draft text for changes under consideration for future extensions to the versatile supplemental enhancement information messages for coded video bitstreams (VSEI) standard (Rec. ITU-T H.274 | ISO/IEC 23002-7) to modify existing SEI messages or specify additional SEI messages.
JVET-AE2032 Technologies under consideration for future extensions of VSEI (draft 1) The following 7 documents were produced as WG 5 documents only: WG 5 N 217 Request for ISO/IEC 14496-10 11th edition WG 5 N 219 Disposition of comments received on ISO/IEC 23002-7:2022 DAM 1 WG 5 N 220 Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23002-7:202x Versatile supplemental enhancement information messages for coded video bitstreams (3rd edition) WG 5 N 222 Disposition of comments received on ISO/IEC CDTR 23002-9 WG 5 N 225 Request for ISO/IEC 23008-2:202x/Amd.1 WG 5 N 227 Disposition of comments received on ISO/IEC 23090-3:2022 DAM 1 WG 5 N 228 Text of ISO/IEC FDIS 23090-3:202x Versatile video coding (3rd edition) The following 5 draft revised ITU-T Recommendations were forwarded by JVET and Q6/16 for ITU-T Consent: TD169/Plen ITU-T H.265 (V9) "High efficiency video coding" (Rev.) TD171/Plen ITU-T H.266 (V3) "Versatile...
Decisions
As a primary goal, the JVET meeting reviewed the work that was performed in the interim period since the thirtieth JVET meeting in producing the following documents:
The meeting was closed at 1215 CEST on 2023-07-19.
Citation
New Search