Back to Search
Document details
On clarification of applicable conditions of DMVR and BDOF
Abstract
One of the applicable conditions of DMVR and BDOF is that luminance coefficients and offsets for weighted prediction do not exist for both L0 and L1 reference indexes. However, when any luminance coefficient does not exist and some chroma coefficients exist, the applicable conditions of DMVR and BDOF are not clear. There are bugs of both text and software, In this contribution, add a condition that chroma coefficients and offsets for weighted prediction do not exist for both L0 and L1 reference indexes. The changes are to add only one line to the applicable condition of both DMVR and BDOF. There is no change of experimental results on CTC. There were negligible differences for fade sequences when WeightedPredB on VTM-7.0 is set to 1. If the chroma weighted prediction is not constrained, the bugs of text and software should be fixed.
JVET-Q0128 On clarification of applicable conditions of DMVR and BDOF [T. Chujoh, T. Hashimoto, E. Sasaki, T. Ikai (Sharp)]
References:
PATENTS:
US12418674B2
0.34
2025-09-16
JP7752799B2
0.32
2025-10-10
WO2024155106A1
0.30
2024-07-25
JP7541096B2
0.30
2024-08-27
JP2021048514A
0.28
2021-03-25
US12314437B2
0.28
2025-05-27
JP7466907B2
0.26
2024-04-15
JP7650386B2
0.23
2025-03-24
JVET-Q0128-bugfix-v2.docx
JVET-Q0128-spec.docx
JVET-Q0128-v3.docx
JVET-Q0128-v3.pdf
JVET-Q0128_black-fade_ctc vs. wpm0.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_black-fade_ctc vs. wpm4.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_black-fade_wpm0 vs. propsal.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_black-fade_wpm4 vs. proposal.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_white-fade_ctc vs. wpm0.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_white-fade_ctc vs. wpm4.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_white-fade_wpm0 vs. proposal.xlsm
JVET-Q0128_white-fade_wpm4 vs. proposal.xlsm
Decisions
JVET-Q0128 On clarification of applicable conditions of DMVR and BDOF [T. Chujoh, T. Hashimoto, E. Sasaki, T. Ikai (Sharp)]
Citation